<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.annieli.co.uk/2009/11/26/advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.annieli.co.uk/2009/11/26/advertising/</link>
	<description>The world through my eyes.  A blog made of fail.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 07:44:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Annie</title>
		<link>http://blog.annieli.co.uk/2009/11/26/advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-1168</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.annieli.co.uk/?p=433#comment-1168</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have to hand it on until Thursday but any suggestion is helpful.  I&#039;ve changed my design anyway as you&#039;ll see when you get back.  The shank/band of the ring it a little more interesting and it doesn&#039;t look like a bog-standard ring.

The shape of that asymmetric bands was a pain - and wouldn&#039;t sit flush as a stack - to work with so the change was better off. :)

I agree with it looking beastly now you mention it.  It is a guy&#039;s, as well and woman&#039;s, ring so I wasn&#039;t sure where to draw the line between delicate and manly.  Measuring at 8mm wide and 2.5mm thickness so it is quite chunky.

I did consider using a different gemstone but the stone set one is meant to be an engagement ring, which are usually set with diamonds.  Using alternative gemstones wouldn&#039;t have suited as my collection comprises anniversary rings and should someone actually want to go further than 5 years with the collection, it would have conflicted with the engagement ring.

Thank you for you opinion.  Would have helped to reply earlier as I&#039;m done with the Matrix side of things and have mainly been working on the advert. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have to hand it on until Thursday but any suggestion is helpful.  I&#8217;ve changed my design anyway as you&#8217;ll see when you get back.  The shank/band of the ring it a little more interesting and it doesn&#8217;t look like a bog-standard ring.</p>
<p>The shape of that asymmetric bands was a pain &#8211; and wouldn&#8217;t sit flush as a stack &#8211; to work with so the change was better off. <img src='http://blog.annieli.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I agree with it looking beastly now you mention it.  It is a guy&#8217;s, as well and woman&#8217;s, ring so I wasn&#8217;t sure where to draw the line between delicate and manly.  Measuring at 8mm wide and 2.5mm thickness so it is quite chunky.</p>
<p>I did consider using a different gemstone but the stone set one is meant to be an engagement ring, which are usually set with diamonds.  Using alternative gemstones wouldn&#8217;t have suited as my collection comprises anniversary rings and should someone actually want to go further than 5 years with the collection, it would have conflicted with the engagement ring.</p>
<p>Thank you for you opinion.  Would have helped to reply earlier as I&#8217;m done with the Matrix side of things and have mainly been working on the advert. <img src='http://blog.annieli.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://blog.annieli.co.uk/2009/11/26/advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-1164</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.annieli.co.uk/?p=433#comment-1164</guid>
		<description>personally, i think the ring&#039;s a bit of a beast (in size i mean). the design itself is quite cool and the gem is a good choice for unisex.. maybe choose another gem to see what the design looks like? (probably a bit late but i&#039;m free now to check out your blog.) xx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>personally, i think the ring&#8217;s a bit of a beast (in size i mean). the design itself is quite cool and the gem is a good choice for unisex.. maybe choose another gem to see what the design looks like? (probably a bit late but i&#8217;m free now to check out your blog.) xx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

